Amber Heard has been accused of editing photos of her bruises during the defamation trial. Unsealed documents show that her team accused Johnny Depp of the same thing.

• Amber Heard’s team said a forensic analysis called into question the authenticity of the injury images provided by Johnny Depp.

• Heard was also accused of editing photos of the alleged abuse during the defamation trial.

• Approximately 6000 pages of documents From the Deep Heard trial was revealed this weekend.

Amber Heard’s attorneys have charged Johnny Depp with editing photos of his scrapes and bruises, as well as Heard’s voice, that were filed as part of a defamation trial earlier this year, according to newly disclosed court documents.

Heard’s team, including attorneys Benjamin Rotterborn and Elaine Breedhoft, claimed that metadata from the photos Depp’s team provided contained dates showing the photos were modified years after they were taken, according to motion request As of December 2021 that has been opened over the weekend and reviewed by daily monster.

Among the alleged inconsistencies is one photo that was created in 2019, although the photo was supposedly taken in 2015, according to the movement. Heard’s team said another image had no creation date but had an edited date of July 2020.

The team also asked Depp to produce “all recordings that contain Mrs. Heard’s voice,” The request appears, but claimed that the audio files provided had been edited. Team Heard’s full audio request.

The Daily Beast reports that forensic expert Julian Ackert, who was hired by Heard’s team to review photos and audio documents from Depp, has questioned their authenticity.

“Missing creation dates and/or modification dates following the date of the facts can be a sign of tampering with digital evidence,” Hurd’s team said of Ackert’s analysis.

The court ruled to exclude Ackert’s testimony during the trial, as suggested Presented by Deb’s team.

Depp’s team argued that the “modified” dates Ackert referred to refer to the last time the image was saved, and said Ackert’s findings would create an “unfair bias” that would “mislead the jury.”

Heard came under audit During the trial after two photos of her bruises from May 2016 were shown side-by-side during the trial, with one photo significantly redder than the other.

The story continues

Depp’s team alleged that Heard edited the photos in order to make her face “look more red”, which Heard denied. Heard said the photos were different due to the lighting.

Then Depp’s lawyer brought in witnesses who said they had not noticed bruises on Heard’s face at the time.

Shahd Akert During the trial that Heard’s photos were original. Depp’s criminal witness, Brian Neumeister, testified that he could Don’t check Whether the photos have been modified or not.

Depp’s attorney did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment.

Read the original article on from the inside